THE DOYLE DIARIES: THE LAST GREAT DOYLE MYSTERY
By MICHAEL
BAKER (Paddington Press; 1978) What the book does reveal is a rich and
strange netherworld of fairies and demons.
Charles Doyle was an extraordinarily accomplished artist, and his
work here, in its amazing boldness and color, can stand up to that of
nearly any Victorian draftsman. It’s
been favorably compared (by individuals far more authoritative than me) to
the work of big names like Fuseli and Blake. On display is an evident love of fantasy and
the macabre. Angelic fairies
are a constant presence, as are various demonic critters.
Malevolent giant birds number among the latter, offset by
butterflies, infants and hooded skeletons representing death, which appear
on several occasions to offer a longed-for deliverance.
Alongside one such rendering is a penciled caption reading “I
do believe that to be a Catholic there is nothing so sweet in life as
leaving it.” The captions are copious, and among the most
curious portions of the book. Doyle
had a penchant for odd quips and nonsensical phrases (under a drawing of a
dog: “This dog has such a twist in his tail that it’s turned him right
over”, while an ornately attired woman is labeled “Madam”
and beside her a frumpy gal identified as “Dam
Mad”). Some of the
captions are downright bizarre (“This
is a pure accidental face”) and others rendered in unreadable
scribble. An appendix at the
end of the book helpfully deciphers Doyle’s scrawl, which is often plain
incoherent. Little is known about the creator of this
mysterious volume outside brief snatches from biographies of his more
famous son Arthur. Michael
Baker, a British documentary producer, sought to find out the facts about
Charles Doyle after becoming enraptured with these pictures, resulting in
a 29-page introduction entitled “The
Strange and Curious Case of Charles Altamont Doyle.”
This
“Strange and Curious Case” records Baker’s obsessive Sherlock
Holmsian quest for information on the elusive Charles Doyle, and why he
was interned in an insane asylum when he was allegedly of sound mind. What Baker ultimately discovered about Doyle was surprisingly
mundane, at least by modern standards, proving Holmes’ axiom that “the
more bizarre a thing is the less mysterious it proves to be.”
It turned out that Charles Doyle was not mad or even (as was
claimed by Charles’ contemporaries) epileptic.
Rather, he was an alcoholic. Alcoholism
was apparently an unconscionable ailment in Victorian society, and the
Doyles went to great lengths to cover up this embarrassing fact.
This includes Arthur Conan Doyle himself, who appears to have been
at least partially responsible for his father’s institutionalization.
This mystery, as unraveled by Baker, is certainly intriguing, but
what ultimately resonates is the Diary itself, an undeniable piece of
artistic brilliance that’s gorgeous, oddly captivating, and, finally,
deeply haunting. |