Reviews
Fiction
Non-Fiction
Film

Other
Commentary
Review Index
 

 

THE CREMASTER CYCLE

Here Iím going to look over Matthew Barneyís CREMASTER cycle. These five digitally lensed films, made over a nine year period, represent one of the most unique events in film history. Unique because theyíve captured the hearts, minds and wallets of the snootier-than-thou New York art crowd, who view them as bonafide objects díart rather than proper films.

     I donít know much about the art world (thank God!) but do know a little something about filmmaking, and so can attest that cinematically the CREMASTERS leave much to be desired. Theyíre dreamlike nonlinear swirls packed with all manner of grotesquerie that woefully lack the savvy of true masters of cinematic bizarrie like Alejandro Jodorowsky, David Lynch or Carmelo Bene. Of course, the fact that Barney identifies himself as an artiste and not a moviemaker affords him a pat defense for his filmsí shortcomings: itís art, man!

     And yet the CREMASTER flicks cannot be entirely dismissed. Any lover of the bizarre owes it to him/herself to see these films, or at least parts 2 and 3, as they contain many striking elements. Keep in mind, though, that your sole opportunity to do so is via the periodic revival screenings at art film venues (the latest at L.A.ís Nuart Theater in mid-June 2010, where I viewed these films), as the CREMASTER cycle will apparently never be distributed on commercial DVD.

     Why? Because Barney sells limited edition DVDs of his films to art collectors for hundreds of thousands of dollars apiece (art just isnít art, it seems, unless itís really expensive) and uses the funds to finance his subsequent efforts. In this way he avoids the soul-crushing realities of independent film financing, and makes a comfortable living for himself in the process. I imagine Jodorowsky (who for the past twenty years has been unable to come up with sufficient funds to mount any new films) and Lynch (whose budgets tend to be laughably low) must be tearing their hair out at this news.

     But anyway, letís take a look at the CREMASTER cycle. Iím going to review these films in the (dis)order they were made, which means Iíll begin with part 4 and continue with parts 1, 5, 2 and 3. Iíll also take a look at Barneyís more recent project DRAWING RESTRAINT 9, which is essentially CREMASTER 6.

     The cycle began back in 1994 with CREMASTER 4. Far more raggedy and homemade than the subsequent installments, it features a satyr-like dude (played by Matthew Barney himself) tap dancing in an ocean-bound cathedral, intercut with racecar drivers speeding down an open road. Eventually the satyr drops through a hole, ending up beneath the ocean floor in a slime-clogged maze of tunnels while tiny balls of goo ooze out of the racecar driversí pockets and a group of giggling women make their way toward the cathedral. It concludes with one of the most repellent images of all time: a manís testicles squeezed and prodded with tongs!
     CREMASTER 4 may lack the slickness of the later entries, but itís an excellent introduction to the cycle, with its perverse debunking of masculine archetypes (the cremaster, FYI, is the muscle that hoists and lowers the testicles), faux-mythological imagery and overall love of the grotesque. It also features a lot of petroleum jelly, or Vaseline, which is one of Barneyís favored motifs.
     CREMASTER 4 encapsulates all thatís good about the cycle--mainly a lot of striking imagery--as well as its core weakness: the editing, for which Barney has no evident skill or patience, simply letting his scenes drag on interminably. At least this film only runs 42 minutes, and so isnít as punishing as some of the later entries.

     CREMASTER 1 followed in 1995. It had a far healthier budget than part 4, which is evident in the gaudy art direction. Thereís even some CGI, which wasnít easy (or cheap) to come by in Ď95. As I understand it, after finishing the previous film Barney first hit upon the idea of funding future projects by selling the previous ones for hundreds of thousands of dollars, initially on VHS--yes, you read that right: back in the mid-nineties people actually shelled out upwards of $100,000 for a VHS.
     This film centers primarily on a woman who lives under a table aboard a Good Year blimp. Using grapes that are always changing color (from red to yellow), she controls the actions of a double chorus line whose participants prance around a blue football field. Here we see the first depiction of the semicircle-with-a-line-through-it symbol that has become Matthew Barneyís trademark, amid imagery even more explicitly sexual than that of the preceding film. Overall, however, the segment is quite monotonous.

     1997ís CREMASTER 5 is the least successful of these films. It stars Ursula Andress as an opera singer and Barney again, playing another satyr-like mutant.
     This is the most pretentious entry, and so the most agonizing to sit through. The art direction is stunningly opulent and the images impeccably composed, which may in fact be the biggest problem: Barney, like many filmmakers before him, appears to have become overly caught up in the technical aspects at the expense of everything else. This may be ďartĒ but itís also a film, and pretty scenery does not a good film make!

     CREMASTER 2 arrived in 1999, and I feel itís the best of the lot. It was the first CREMASTER film I saw (it being the first to play semi-commercially) and made enough of an impression that I was inspired to check out the rest of the cycle (whereas had I begun with parts 1 or 5 I strongly doubt Iíd have bothered).
     Itís supposed to be about a meeting between Harry Houdini and mass murderer Greg Gilmore, but youíll have to watch closely to discern that. What registers is--again--the imagery, with moments of such mind-bending strangeness that I honestly canít be sure I didnít dream them (an early scene in a gas station is particularly striking). Barney also includes enough evocatively creepy organ music, semi-pornographic interludes (a vagina with butterfly wings?) and (of course) Vaseline to almost make up for his standard non-editing.
     But for all that I think Barney allows too much conscious thought to contaminate this otherwise impeccable dream-fest. American flags are a constant, along with various depictions of male aggression (a blaring death rocker, a man riding a bucking bronco, a monster truck), suggesting that Barney was attempting to make a statement about violence in American culture--although precisely what he was trying to say is anyoneís guess!

     This brings us to the three hour CREMASTER 3 from 2002, the most monumental installment by far. It contains an amazing succession of bizarre and horrific imagery: a giant tramping around a mossy seaside cliff, an emaciated stone woman dug up from the ground, a car slammed into repeatedly by other cars until only a tiny piece of crushed metal remains, a man (played by Barney) with a flower penis, a slimy wormlike thingee that emits a stream of goop, a bar covered in frozen Vaseline, rotting zombie horses pulling a cart down a racetrack, a guy scaling the interior of NYCís Guggenheim Museum so he can romp with a satyr woman residing in the upper levelsÖyes, itís that kind of movie!
     Had it been made with more finesse, CREMASTER 3 might have wound up a surreal masterwork on the order of Carmelo Beneís OUR LADY OF THE TURKS, Jodorowskyís HOLY MOUNTAIN or Lynchís ERASERHEAD, but itís not to be. Certain critics claimed that Barneyís editing skills here had improved since the earlier installments, but I saw no evidence of that. This film is every bit as formless and drawn-out as its predecessors, making one regret that it isnít available on DVD (although Barney has deigned to release a small portion of it for home viewing called THE ORDER), as what CREMASTER 3 needs more than anything is a fast forward button.

     That technically concludes my survey, but, as threatened, Iím going to finish with an quick overview of Matthew Barneyís DRAWING RESTRAINT 9 (2005). It looks and plays much like a CREMASTER flick, and was financed and distributed in a similar fashion--meaning you wonít be seeing it on DVD any time soon (dry your eyes!).
     Itís another surreal slog in which Barney and his real life wife Bjork (who also composed the supremely irritating music score) play stowaways on a Japanese whaling ship. They get outfitted in wildly ornate Kabuki getup while on the deck of the ship crewmen pour untold gallons of Vaseline into a mold of that aforementioned semi-circle-with-a-line-through-it symbol. Said mold eventually hardens as the ship floods and the protagonists slowly slice each other up. That partís eye-opening, to say the least, but for most of its interminable two-and-a-half-hour running time the film is maddeningly uneventful, making one realize that a large part of the CREMASTER flicksí charm was their fecund grotesquerie, of which DRAWING RESTRAINT 9 contains very little.

 

--6/22/10

     

HOME   MOVIES   STORIES   COMIX   NEW   FAQ   CONTEST   GAMES   ADAM'S BIO